For those who have no idea what Novaluxia is, or if this is the first time you are hearing the name, this article is for you.
According to their website, Novaluxia claims to be an AI-powered social commerce platform in the Philippines. They say they combine AI technology and social interaction to make shopping easier, more enjoyable, and more affordable for users inside the platform.
Inside Novaluxia, users can shop in a built-in mall, participate in what they call group buying, join lucky draws, earn reward points, upgrade memberships, and unlock higher earning tiers.
But the real question most people are asking is this:
Is Novaluxia truly e-commerce? Is it a marketplace platform? Is it social commerce? Is it community commerce? Or is it something else entirely?
Before we answer that, we need to define what real e-commerce actually is.
E-commerce is direct online buying and selling. In traditional e-commerce, the process is simple. A seller lists a product, a buyer purchases the product, the product is delivered, and the transaction ends.
The seller earns from product margin.
For example, if someone buys a product for ₱500 and sells it for ₱2,500, and spends ₱1,000 on ads and shipping, the profit is ₱1,000. The core income driver is product sales. No product sold means no revenue.
That is the foundation of real e-commerce.
An e-commerce platform is a marketplace like Lazada or Shopee. The platform acts as a bridge between sellers and buyers.
Sellers list products. Buyers purchase those products. The platform handles payment processing and logistics. The platform earns from commission per sale, sponsored listings, transaction fees, and logistics services.
But again, the core revenue still comes from product sales.
Social e-commerce adds content and influencers into the equation. TikTok Shop is a clear example.
There are three major parties involved: the seller, the creator or affiliate, and the buyer. The creator earns commission from product sales. The platform earns commission and advertising fees.
The core revenue still comes from product sales.
Community e-commerce is group-based buying. Examples include co-operatives, Facebook selling groups, Discord groups, and Telegram communities.
The concept is simple. A community gathers buyers together to unlock better pricing or exclusive deals. Revenue still comes from product margin or commission.
In legitimate group buying, there is a minimum required number of buyers. Once the target is reached, all participants receive the product at a discounted price. If the target is not reached, the order is canceled and the money is refunded.
Everyone who joins expects to receive the product.
Novaluxia does not fully match traditional e-commerce.
In traditional e-commerce, you choose a product, pay for it, and receive it. There are no raffle mechanics. There is no “win or lose” outcome. The goal is to obtain the product.
In Novaluxia’s group buying, the mechanics are different.
When you participate in NovaBolt group buying, you choose a group that is close to completion, click join, and pay ₱1,000. When the group reaches 100 participants, only one participant wins the product through a raffle.
The rest lose.
That already differs from legitimate group buying, where everyone gets the product once the minimum number of buyers is reached.
Even more concerning, if you win, you have the option not to claim the product and instead get your money back. In legitimate group buying, people join because they want to buy the product at a discount. Here, participants are not necessarily interested in receiving the product.
This leads to a crucial observation: the main motivation appears to be earning bonus points.
If you lose the raffle, you receive bonus points. Those points can be converted into peso.
For example, if you lose and you have no recruits, you might receive 10 bonus points. If you have recruits, you might receive 13 or even 18 points.
This changes the purpose of participation. The focus shifts from buying a product to earning points.
Now the important question arises: where does the money for those points come from?
If 100 participants each contribute ₱1,000, the total pool for that cycle becomes ₱100,000. Out of those 100 participants, 99 will have their ₱1,000 refunded and, in addition, receive 10 bonus points each, which is equivalent to ₱990 distributed by the platform on top of returning their original capital.
If the winner chooses not to claim the product and gets refunded, then no product sale occurred.
If the winner claims the product, the platform still distributes 990 pesos while collecting only ₱1,000 from the winner. How does that cover product cost, logistics, platform operations, and still generate profit?
Unless the product cost is extremely low, the math raises sustainability concerns.
Another red flag is the referral requirement.
If you have no recruits, you can only participate in Daily Use group buying up to 100 times. After that, you must upgrade.
How do you upgrade?
You recruit two active members.
In legitimate group buying or traditional e-commerce, you do not need to recruit people to continue buying products. Here, recruitment unlocks earning potential.
That shifts the business focus from product demand to network expansion.
In normal e-commerce, coupons come from sales events, minimum spend requirements, seller promotions, or loyalty programs.
In Novaluxia, coupons are earned through recruitment activity. The more active your recruits are, the more benefits you unlock.
This suggests that growth and participation are prioritized over retail sales.
SVIP reportedly costs ₱4,000. It allegedly offers weekly fixed income of ₱1,600. In three months, the claim is that you can earn ₱19,200 plus recover your capital.
Fixed weekly income is not typical e-commerce terminology. It resembles investment language.
If earnings are fixed regardless of actual product sales performance, the question remains: what funds those payouts?
If the payout depends on continuous new member deposits, the structure becomes growth-dependent.
Members can earn 16% from Level 1 recruits and 4% from Level 2 recruits.
This resembles a multi-level compensation structure. Again, the focus appears to be network activity rather than product sales.
Across all earning streams inside Novaluxia, where does the profit originate?
Is there public audit documentation showing that revenue primarily comes from product sales?
Are there transparent supplier relationships and commission disclosures?
Or does the platform rely heavily on participant deposits and upgrade fees?
Based on the structure observed, it appears that product sales are not the main engine driving payouts.
Based on the structure, mechanics, and compensation model explained above, Novaluxia is not recommended.
This conclusion is not based on emotion or bias. It is based on structural analysis.
The primary concern is sustainability.
In legitimate e-commerce, revenue is driven by real product demand. Buyers purchase products because they want them. Sellers earn from margin. Platforms earn from commission per sale. Everything revolves around product movement.
In Novaluxia’s case, the dominant behavior appears to revolve around earning points, unlocking tiers, recruiting members, and accessing higher reward levels. The product itself does not seem to be the core driver of activity. In fact, even when someone wins a product, they have the option not to claim it. That alone shows that consumption is not the priority.
Another major concern is the growth dependency of the system. If participation rewards, upgrade benefits, and team commissions depend heavily on recruitment and continued inflow of new members, then the long-term stability of payouts becomes questionable. Any model that relies more on new participant deposits than on verified product sales carries inherent risk.
The presence of:
creates a structure that resembles high-risk financial ecosystems rather than traditional e-commerce.
There is also limited transparency regarding:
Without those elements, it becomes difficult to verify whether the payout system is truly backed by retail economics or by internal circulation of participant funds.
Because of these structural risks, it is not advisable to:
Deposit significant amounts of money.
Upgrade based on promised fixed returns.
Recruit friends and family without full understanding of the risks.
Provide sensitive personal identification information without verified security standards.
Even if early participants are currently receiving payouts, that does not automatically mean the system is sustainable long term. Growth-dependent systems can appear profitable in early phases but become unstable once expansion slows down.
The idea of community-driven commerce and shared value sounds attractive. However, execution and economic foundation matter more than branding.
For these reasons, Novaluxia carries high financial risk and is not recommended for participation, especially for individuals who cannot afford to lose their capital.
As always, do your own research, verify information independently, and never invest money you are not prepared to lose.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
A new platform called FlickerAlgo has been making waves online, claiming to be an advanced AI trading platform backed by a reputable investment firm. It promises high profits, server-based trading systems, and "secure cold wallet storage." But is it really legitimate—or just another scam designed to fool investors? In this review, we’ll break down all […]
Today, we will answer a question from one of our viewers on YouTube. Here’s their comment: “Sir, good day. Please review the (Cryptex decentralized finance staking program). It claims to operate on blockchain and generates 1% to 3% profit. Thank you, I’ll look forward to it.” In this blog, we will discuss whether Cryptex is […]
Today, we’re going to talk about Kantar Philippines, a platform claiming to be a legitimate survey site where you can earn money. But the big question is: Is it really legit? Or is there something fishy going on behind the scenes? Let’s find out together. What is Kantar? To answer whether Kantar Philippines is legit […]
