Domain reviewed: https://sjc9vm.mobil12.com/ (subdomain) and www.mobil12.com
Name used by the platform: “ExxonMobil Store”
Support channel shown: Telegram @ExxonMobil88

Based on my investigation, this “ExxonMobil Store” is not a real ExxonMobil-run ecommerce or marketing program.

It matches the classic USDT task-order / VIP package pattern where users deposit crypto, click “virtual orders” to generate “income,” and are pushed to recruit others through multi-level commissions.

The earnings claims are mathematically extreme and structurally depend on new deposits, which is why these platforms commonly end in blocked withdrawals and sudden shutdowns.

What is “ExxonMobil Store” (sjc9vm.mobil12.com)?

The site presents itself as a “blockchain e-commerce platform” that allegedly helps Apple’s online store boost product visibility by creating virtual orders. You do not receive any note, product, or proof of real sales. Instead, you:

• create an account
• bind a TRC-20 or BNB Chain wallet
• deposit USDT
• unlock a VIP tier
• click tasks (“orders”) and receive “commission”
• withdraw (they claim 1 to 5 minutes)

They also use the ExxonMobil brand name and show “regulatory authority” logos to look legitimate, while directing users to Telegram for support (a huge red flag for “investment” operations).

For context: a real, legitimate merch store associated with ExxonMobil branding exists on a different domain (not mobil12.com). (exxonmobilstore.com)

How do you “earn” here?

1) VIP deposit to unlock daily profits

They publish fixed VIP packages where a deposit unlocks a fixed daily profit, for 30 days, then “refund” rules apply.

Examples from the VIP table:

• VIP1: deposit 10 USDT, daily profit 6 USDT
• VIP12: deposit 50,000 USDT, daily profit 40,000 USDT

2) Daily “task orders”

Tasks are described as “virtual orders” assigned by an “algorithm,” and you must complete them daily to claim income. Failure can lead to “no benefits” or account restrictions.

3) Recruitment commissions (3 levels)

They pay commissions when recruits deposit:

• Level 1: 12%
• Level 2: 2%
• Level 3: 1%

They even advertise bonus rewards like inviting specific VIP levels daily for extra USDT.

Claims vs red flags (with explanations)

Below are the key claims the platform makes, and the red flags inside each claim.

Claim 1: “Funds are monitored and managed by the bank, and the funds are safe.”

Red flags:

• No bank name, no custodian name, no jurisdiction, no license number, no verifiable contract.
• Deposits are done via crypto wallets (TRC-20 / BNB Chain), which is the opposite of “bank-managed custody.” Once USDT leaves your wallet, there’s no bank protection, no chargeback, and no regulated dispute process.

Legit vs scam comparison:
Legit custodians clearly disclose the regulated entity, the custodian bank, the jurisdiction, and the exact custody structure. Scam platforms use “bank monitored” as a comfort line without anything you can verify.

Claim 2: “We are helping Apple’s online store increase visibility and sales… fully automatic… virtual orders.”

Red flags:

• “Virtual orders” that generate commissions without delivering products is the exact language used by task-order scams (also called order-grabbing).
• No proof of a real partnership with Apple, no affiliate program documentation, and no verifiable business relationship.
• The business model makes no economic sense: real ecommerce marketing does not pay random individuals guaranteed daily profits for clicking buttons.

Legit vs scam comparison:
Legit affiliate marketing pays commissions from real tracked sales through official platforms, with transparent terms, and you earn a percentage of actual purchases. Here, “orders” are internal screen actions that can be simulated.

Claim 3: “You can earn $6 to $40,000 per day… withdraw immediately.”

Red flags:

• The ROI is extreme. Example: VIP1 claims 6 USDT per day on 10 USDT deposit = 60% daily. Over 30 days, they show 180 USDT total profit on a 10 USDT deposit, which is 1,800% in a month.
• VIP12 claims 40,000 USDT per day on 50,000 USDT deposit = 80% daily.
• Any real business that could produce those returns would not need public deposits and Telegram recruiting.

Legit vs scam comparison:
Real investments never promise fixed daily profits at these levels. Even very high-risk trading cannot guarantee daily returns, and regulated providers avoid “guaranteed” language.

Claim 4: “Long-term platform, never closed.”

Red flags:

• This is not a measurable guarantee and it’s commonly used by Ponzi-style sites right before they disappear.
• If they were truly long-term and legal, they would operate with proper licensing, public leadership, and official customer support channels, not mainly Telegram.

Claim 5: “Regulatory Authority” logos (FCA, ASIC, MAS, NFA)

Red flags:

• Showing regulator logos is not proof of authorization.
• There is no displayed license number you can cross-check, and no evidence the platform is registered/authorized by any of these bodies.

Legit vs scam comparison:
Licensed firms provide a registration number you can verify directly on the regulator’s register, and the legal entity name matches exactly.

Claim 6: “We are transparent, visit the UK official registry…”

They point to a Companies House link and also list a company name and number.

Red flags:

• Their provided link SL036513 is not the company they claim it is. That Companies House record is for ARAMCO INVESTCO LP, not ExxonMobil. (Find and Update Company Information)
• The actual Companies House record for EXXONMOBIL UK HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED is company number 12434018. (Find and Update Company Information)
• Mixing real corporate names with mismatched registry links is a common impersonation tactic: it creates the illusion of legitimacy while avoiding direct accountability.

Legit vs scam comparison:
A legitimate company citation links to the correct legal entity record, and the website domain is normally connected to that organization through official channels.

Claim 7: “Automatic refund of principal after 30 days (with conditions).”

Red flags:

• The refund is conditional and vague (violations, rules, tasks, fraud, etc.). This is the typical “we can deny refund anytime” clause.
• In many crypto deposit scams, early withdrawals may be allowed to build trust, then later blocked with reasons like “verification,” “tax,” “maintenance,” “anti-money laundering,” or “rule violation.”

Legit vs scam comparison:
Legit refund terms are specific, enforceable, and tied to consumer protection law or regulated processes. Here it’s discretionary.

Claim 8: “The fastest way to make money is to build a team.”

Red flags:

• This is the loudest signal: income is pushed toward recruitment rather than real product value.
• 3-level commissions + VIP upgrade incentives + daily team targets is a classic structure for a pyramid-style cashflow system.

Legit vs scam comparison:
Legit referral programs exist, but they are secondary, limited, and not the main engine of returns. When recruiting is the “fastest way,” it’s usually because new deposits fund payouts.

Final analysis: why this looks like a task-order USDT scam

When you combine:

• guaranteed high daily profits tied to VIP deposits
• “virtual order” tasks with no real goods delivered
• recruitment commissions as a major income path
• regulator logo-washing without verifiable licensing
• brand impersonation signals (ExxonMobil name use)
• Companies House misdirection (wrong registry link used)

…the pattern is consistent with a deposit-based payout scheme that depends on continuous inflow of new money.

Conclusion: SCAM

Based on my investigation, sjc9vm.mobil12.com / mobil12.com (“ExxonMobil Store”) is a scam, specifically matching the common USDT VIP task-order model that uses a famous brand name, fake legitimacy signals, and unrealistic fixed returns to collect deposits and drive recruitment.