Promise on the table: “450% income after 3 days, 15% reinvest bonus, and 10% deposit bonus.”
That’s what AuroraPhil is currently advertising to would-be investors.

Domain: auroraphil.com • www.auroraphil.com

You’re probably asking: can real trading deliver percentages like that?

Let’s examine everything—exactly and completely—based on what the site and its promoters show publicly, what users report in open groups, what can be inferred from the domain/ownership signals, and what we can verify (or fail to verify) from their “proof of trading.”

What is AuroraPhil (auroraphil.com)?

AuroraPhil is an investment website spreading through Facebook groups via referral links (the URLs typically include a parameter like AURORAREFER=...).

The pitch revolves around fixed-term packages where you “invest” into a plan and receive a pre-declared return after a short period.

The headline claim they push most aggressively is the “coin Holder Package” promising 450% in just 3 days, plus a 15% reinvest bonus and 10% deposit bonus.

They also float other packages such as 290% in 5 days (with 12% reinvest + 10% deposit bonus), and, in different materials, 25% in 6 days and 90% in 16 days (some posts even show 9% in 16 days—the inconsistency is itself noteworthy). A “SUPER VIP ACCESS” tier is also mentioned, implying extra benefits if you put in more money.

How it’s framed: deposit → wait the stated days → withdraw your “profit” → optionally refer others to boost earnings.

This is the classic HYIP (high-yield investment program) workflow where the returns are fixed and schedule-based, not variable the way real market-driven trading results fluctuate.

Important identity note: We found no claim from auroraphil.com or its promoters that they are affiliated with Aurora (O.A.) Philippines, Inc. (the furniture company at auroraphils.com). The two appear unrelated, and the investment site does not publicly present itself as connected to the furniture business.

Claimed model: “We trade on Bybit, that’s why we can pay profits”

In videos and posts, a person presented as the CEO goes live to show that they “trade” on an exchange (most often named as Bybit) as a form of transparency. Two realities collide with this pitch:

1. Regulatory exposure in the Philippines. Philippine regulators have repeatedly warned the public about unlicensed crypto platforms operating locally. Even if a scheme says “we use Bybit,” that does not make the scheme compliant or safe for PH investors who hand money to a third-party website that is not the exchange itself and does not show licenses, audited financials, or custodial assurances.
2. Brand piggybacking ≠ affiliation. Bybit itself markets a feature named “Aurora AI” under its own platform branding. That does not establish any connection with auroraphil.com. Using the word “Aurora” in marketing does not create affiliation or partnership.

Forensic look at their “trading proof” (screenshot/live demo)

From their livestreams and screenshots, multiple concrete signs indicate a mocked or fabricated trading interface, not a live exchange account:

• No market/ticker anywhere. Legit UIs always show the pair (e.g., BTCUSDT/BTC-PERP) and timeframe.
• Non-standard chart. A filled area graph with minimal labeling and a dramatic one-segment vertical jump to ~$80k, then an immediate drop—not a natural live candle feed. No time scale on the x-axis.
• Weird “Slope” control in the position row. There’s a pill labeled “Slope: DOWN” beside “Side: LONG.” No major exchange has a “Slope” control in a live position panel.
• Missing core fields everywhere. No Mark Price, Liquidation Price, margin mode (Cross/Isolated), Funding, Realized PnL, or fee lines—all of which are standard on Bybit/Binance/OKX.
• Generic single “Price.” There’s just one price readout (e.g., $79,749.40) with no Bid/Ask, no Index/Mark variants.
• Spreadsheet-perfect math. The PnL aligns almost perfectly with the simple formula
  PnL ≈ (Price − Entry) × (Size / Entry)
  (e.g., Entry ~$68,770.69, Price ~$79,749.40, Size ~$5,000,000 → PnL ≈ $798k).
  In real platforms, PnL rarely matches a bare formula to the cent because fees, funding, and tick-by-tick moves constantly change the mark.
• No order book, no recent trades, no depth. A genuine pro account always has them visible or quickly accessible.
• No timestamps/timeframe controls. Another giveaway of a staged screen.
• Improbable account scale for a “casual” screencap. Balance numbers like $25M with $5M notional at 10× leverage—yet the view omits all professional risk details you’d normally see on an account that large.
• UI/visual inconsistencies. Elements don’t line up with the exact styling of any major exchange; there’s even an odd teal marker above the chart—not a standard component.

Bottom line: What’s shown is best explained as a demo/mockup built to impress non-traders, not evidence of actual, externally verifiable trading.

Domain & ownership signals

• The domain auroraphil.com is very new (created June 1, 2025) and registered only short-term (to 2026).
• There is no transparent public ownership or independent corporate profile tied to the domain.
• This “new + short + opaque” combination is a textbook risk pattern for short-lived investment sites.

Referral structure & “how you earn”

AuroraPhil leans hard on recruitment. Aside from package returns, the materials describe a multi-level referral payout:

• Level 1 (direct referrals): 10%
• Levels 2–4 (indirect): 1.5%
• Levels 5–10: 1%

This pyramid-shaped structure pays out from incoming deposits rather than from a real, external product or service, which is characteristic of Ponzi economics: earlier participants are paid using money from later participants.

The “Aurora coin/token” claim

They reference or imply a coin/token, but no transparent proof is provided. To establish a real token, a project should present on-chain facts:

• Smart contract address on a public blockchain (so anyone can inspect code and supply).
• Where it’s listed/traded and which Web3 wallets can hold it.
• Liquidity pool details, market depth, and transaction history on a block explorer.
• Whitepaper and project documentation that defines utility, tokenomics, and governance.

AuroraPhil’s dashboard-only balances (if any) are not evidence of a live token. Without contract addresses, listings, and on-chain activity, the “coin” reads as a narrative layer rather than a real asset.

Features you’ll actually encounter

• Account sign-up via referral (/auth/register?AURORAREFER=...).
• Short-term fixed ROI packages (e.g., 450%/3d, 290%/5d, 25%/6d, 90%/16d in circulating promos; sometimes 9%/16d appears—again, inconsistent).
• Facebook group recruitment that labels the site as “legit” and pushes referral onboarding links.
• Login-walled inner pages; no public, auditable trading ledger or third-party custody statements.

Why the risk is extreme

1. Unverifiable trading activity. There’s no public audit, no read-only exchange logs, and the “proof” looks like a custom UI.
2. Fixed and unusually high returns. Real trading is variable; promises like 25% in 6 days, 90% in 16 days, 290% in 5 days, 450% in 3 days are economically implausible without extraordinary, sustained risk—yet the platform presents them as routine.
3. Recruitment-driven economics. Heavy reliance on referrals rather than an external, value-creating business.
4. New, low-transparency domain. Common among short-lived schemes.
5. Regulatory exposure. Name-dropping a big exchange doesn’t cure licensing gaps or transfer safety/compliance to a third-party website.

Are there any “pros”?

From a newcomer’s perspective, two things feel attractive: easy onboarding (email + referral) and pre-declared payouts (you “know” the number on paper).

Unfortunately, those are precisely the two levers HYIPs use to accelerate deposits before people complete due diligence.

Final Verdict

Classification: Not Safe.

AuroraPhil (auroraphil.com) fits the risk profile of a Ponzi-style HYIP: extreme fixed returns, referral-centric growth, mocked trading proof, opaque domain/ownership, no audit or custody, and regulatory exposure. The prudent course is to avoid depositing funds and avoid recruiting others.

If you still want to test claims, here’s what real proof would look like

• Corporate legitimacy: verifiable SEC/DTI permits, legal entity details, and independent financial audits—not screenshots.
• Trading legitimacy: read-only API access to exchange accounts showing real positions and history, reconciled with independent custodian statements.
• Token legitimacy (if any): contract addresses, on-chain activity, liquidity, listings, and whitepaper—all publicly inspectable.
• Withdrawal track record: sustained, independently documented user withdrawals over months, not isolated testimonials.

Bottom line: Given the totality of signals, AuroraPhil is Not Safe.